Position:Home >> Abstract

Comparison between the method of using Spectrophotometry and TOC analyzer to evaluate the reject performance of ultrafiltration membrane
Authors: Chen Zhou, Xiaofeng Lu*, Zhengchi Hou, Xiaokai Bian, Liuqing Shi, Zhongyin Liu
Units: Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
KeyWords: ultrafiltration; rejection ratio; ultraviolet spectrophotometry; total organic carbon analysis
ClassificationCode:TQ028.8
year,volume(issue):pagination: 2011,31(5):29-33

Abstract:
The comparison between the methods of ultraviolet Spectrophotometry and total organic carbon analysis to determine the rejection of the ultrafiltration membrane was made based on studies of the ultrafiltration performance of PVDF membrane and PES membrane in this paper. Through 10 series of parallel tests using 6 probe solutes (egg white albumin and bovine serum albumin,α-chymotrypsin and PEG2000,10000,6000), it could be indicated that: the results got from ultraviolet Spectrophotometry are mainly coincide with that of TOC analysis. Factor analysis was use to further discuss the influence of method choice. The problems of ultraviolet Spectrophotometry such as PEG coloration time were discussed. And the advantage including speediness, accuracy and environmental friendly will widen the application of the method of TOC analysis in the area of membrane’s appraisement.

Funds:
上海市科技攻关项目(08231200300)

AuthorIntro:
周晨(1984-),男,福建漳州人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为膜的研制与应用,E-mail:nickey0809@gmail.com. *通讯联系人:luxiaofeng@sinap.ac.cn

Reference:
[1] 华耀祖.超滤技术与应用[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社,2003.1-43,51-76,80-103,180-190,210-460.
[2] 超滤装置标准[s]. HJ/T271,2006.
[3] Chakrabarty B, Ghoshal A K, Purkait M K. Effect of molecular weight of PEG on membrane morphology and transport properties[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 309: 209-221.
[4] Xu Zhen-Liang, Alsalhy Qusay F.. Effect of Polyethylene Glycol Molecular Weights andConcentrations on Polyethersulfone Hollow Fiber Ultrafiltration Membranes[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2004, 91: 3398-3407.
[5] 卞晓锴,陆晓峰,施柳青. 蛋白质超滤过程及超滤膜的改性研究现状.膜科学与技术, 2001, 21: 46-51
[6] Mosqueda-Jimenez D B, Narbaitz R M, Matsuura T. Effects of preparation conditions on the surface modification and performance of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2006, 99: 2978-2988.
 [7] Mosqueda-Jimenez D B, Narbaitz R M, Matsuura T, et al.. Influence of processing conditions on the properties of ultrafiltration membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2004, 231: 209-224.
[8] Hwang J R, Koo S H, Kim J H, et al. Effects of casting solution composition on performance of poly(ether sulfone) membrane[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1996, 60: 1343-1348
[9] Barzin J, Feng C, Khulbe K C, et al. Characterization of polyethersulfone hemodialysis membrane by ultrafiltration and atomic force microscopy[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2004, 237: 77-85.
[10] Miyano T, Matsuura T, et al. Effect of polyvinylpyrrolidone additive on the pore size and the pore size distribution of Polyethersulfone[J]. Chemical Engineering Communications, 1993, 119: 23-39.

Service:
Download】【Collect

《膜科学与技术》编辑部 Address: Bluestar building, 19 east beisanhuan road, chaoyang district, Beijing; 100029 Postal code; Telephone:010-80492417/010-80485372; Fax:010-80485372 ; Email:mkxyjs@163.com

京公网安备11011302000819号