Position:Home >> Abstract

Performance of a hybrid system of osmotic membrane bioreactor and reverse osmosis
Authors: ZHU Weijun1, WANG Xinhua1,2*, LI Xiufen1,2, REN Yueping1,2
Units: (1.School of Environmental and Civil Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Anaerobic Biotechnology, Wuxi 214122
KeyWords: microfiltration; forward osmosis; reverse osmosis; salt accumulation; draw solute recovery
ClassificationCode:X703.1
year,volume(issue):pagination: 2018,38(3):104-109

Abstract:
In order to overcome the problems including draw solute recovery and salt accumulation associated with the osmotic membrane bioreactors (OMBR), a new OMBR system assisted with microfiltration (MF) membrane for discharging soluble salts and reverse osmosis (RO) membrane for recovering draw solute was proposed in this study. The results indicated that the salinity in the bioreactor was controlled in the range of 1.95-2.43mS/cm due to the introduction of MF membrane. RO membrane could effectively concentrate the draw solution from 33 mS/cm to 45 mS/cm, and thus achieving the simultaneous recovery of draw solute and water. The MF-OMBR-RO system effectively removed the organic matters, ammonia nitrogen and phosphorus, i.e., the RO permeate could be reused as a high quality water while MF effluent was suitable for urban miscellaneous water. Compared with the commercial forward osmosis (FO) membrane made of cellulose triacetate (CTA) and thin-film composite polyamide (TFC), the aquaporin FO membrane used in this study had a lower initial water flux but a more stable operating flux due to a lower biofouling.

Funds:
国家自然科学基金项目(51578265)

AuthorIntro:
朱卫军(1989-),男,江苏东台人,硕士生,主要从事污水处理与资源化研究,E-mail:m18800583921@163.com *通讯联系人,E-mail:xhwang@jiangnan.edu.cn

Reference:
 [1] Cornelissen E R, Harmsen D, de Korte KF, et al. Membrane fouling and process performance of forward osmosis membranes on activated sludge[J]. J Membr Sci, 2008, 319: 158–168.
[2] Coday B D, Xu P, Beaudry E G, et al. The sweet spot of forward osmosis: treatment of produced water, drilling wastewater, and other complex and difficult liquid streams[J]. Desalination, 2014, 333: 23–35.
[3] Linares R V, Yangali-Quintanilla V, Li Z Y, et al. Rejection of micropollutants by clean and fouled forward osmosis membrane[J]. Water Res, 2011, 45: 6737–6744.
[4] Xie M, Nghiem L D, Price W E, et al. Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis[J]. Water Res, 2012, 46: 2683–2692.
[5] Zhang S, Wang P, Fu X, et al. Sustainable water recovery from oily wastewater via forward osmosis-membrane distillation (FO-MD)[J]. Water Res, 2014, 52: 112–121.
[6] Wang X H, Yuan B, Chen Y, et al. Integration of micro-filtration into osmotic membrane bioreactors to prevent salinity build-up[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2014, 167: 116–123.
[7] Luo W H, Phan H V, Xie M, et al. Osmotic versus conventional membrane bioreactors integrated with reverse osmosis for water reuse: biological stability, membrane fouling, and contaminant removal[J]. Water Res, 2017, 109: 122–134.
[8] 国家环境保护总局,水和废水监测分析方法编委会.水和废水检测分析方法[M].(第四版).北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
[9] Wang X H, Zhao Y X, Yuan B, et al. Comparison of biofouling mechanisms between cellulose triacetate (CTA) and thin-film composite (TFC) polyamide forward osmosis membranes in osmotic membrane bioreactors[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2016, 202: 50–58.
[10] Yuan B, Wang X H, Tang C Y, et al. In situ observation of the growth of biofouling layer in osmotic membrane bioreactors by multiple fluorescence labeling and confocal laser scanning microscopy[J].Water Res, 2015, 75: 188–200.
[11] Wang X H, Zhao Y X, Li X F, et al. Performance evaluation of microfiltration-osmotic membrane bioreactor (MF-OMBR) during removing silver nanoparticles from simulated wastewater[J]. Chem Eng J, 2017, 313: 171–178.
[12] Choi B G, Kim D I, Hong S. Fouling evaluation and mechanisms in a FO-RO hybrid process for direct potable reuse[J]. J Membr Sci, 2016, 520: 89–98.
[13] Zaviska F, Chun Y, Heran M, et al. Using FO as pre-treatment of RO for high scaling potential brackish water: Energy and performance optimisation[J]. J Membr Sci, 2015, 492: 430–438.
[14] Xie M, Gray S R.[J]. Sep Purif Technol, 2016, 167: 6–16.
[15] Wang X H, Chang V W C, Tang C Y Y. Osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) technology for wastewater treatment and reclamation: advances, challenges, and prospects for the future[J]. J Membr Sci, 2016, 504: 113–132.
[16] Liu J M, Wang X H, Wang Z W, et al. Integrating microbial fuel cells with anaerobic acidification and forward osmosis membrane for enhancing bioelectricity and water recovery from low-strength wastewater[J]. Water Res, 2017, 110: 74–82.


Service:
Download】【Collect

《膜科学与技术》编辑部 Address: Bluestar building, 19 east beisanhuan road, chaoyang district, Beijing; 100029 Postal code; Telephone:010-80492417/010-80485372; Fax:010-80485372 ; Email:mkxyjs@163.com

京公网安备11011302000819号